Questions:
P. 175 - Foucault emphasizes the distinction between "seat" and "essence" of disease. How are we to understand this distinction?
P. 189 - Multiple senses of "essence" need to be tracked here ("essential diseases" and "essences of diseases").
P. 189 - How do we understand the being of the disease given the "disappearance" of the nosological essence?
P. 185 (&c) - What are the different conceptions/definitions of fever? And how do these map to broader (more general) distinctions that Foucault is making?
P. 192 - "The historical and concrete a priori" of the modern medical gaze (cf. xv).
Throughout the book, medical experience is a concept Foucault relies on.
- What are the various layers or levels of medical experience in this concept? How do we understand medical experience at the end of the book?
- Who is the subject of experience in this book? Who is the subject of perception?
- How do we understand medical experience at the end of the book?
Discussion:
On page 190 MF discusses the "dissolution of the ontology of fever" is the "best-known element of the analysis". This "negative" moment is "merely" a "negative counterpart" of a "positive element" whih is the idea of physiological method applied to organic illness. (This is a very dialectical statement in Foucault.)
From "a being of the disease" to a notion of disease as a "complex movement". A de-essentialized theory of disease constitutes "the whole essence of the pathological".
- Shift from a medicine of diseases to a medicine of the pathological.
What is the relationship between the life/death and the normal/pathological pair?
- Disease reconfigured as a process becomes a tendency toward death.
- Only in the encounter with death, can the relation between disease and life become pathological, through the path of organs
Prior to anatomo-clinical medicine, death existed (surely) but not as a depth condition for disease as the pathological. Death was previously not a part of the savoir of the medical gaze.
- From a classificatory essentialist theory of diseases; to a scalar conception of disease along a scale of normal to pathological
- But this scalar conception needs death as one of its poles
No comments:
Post a Comment