Questions
1) What
is meant by ‘deterritorialization’?
2) In
what sense is the text anti-fascist? -
viz. Foucault/preface
3) What
is “production”-à how it ‘works’? of what, etc.? – p.148
4) What
does ‘decoding’ mean? – p.166 – relationship between ‘overcoding’ and
Foucault’s ‘figure'
5) Primitive
territorial machine; socius; social machine – p.140
6) “Universal
history is a history of contingencies” – How exactly? Aren’t these antithetical
to one another? p.140
Fascism – desiring
our own oppression; desiring being led; love of power (xiii)
Deterritorialization
– transformation of a meaning & territory
Territorialization
- setting up a territory/ region – building a space & meaning
Capitalism as
decoding machine à transforms codes
Universal in
negative sense? – potential of
capitalism is universal in all social forms
p.150 – history
– dynamic & open social reality
dysfunctions/
crises of the social/desiring-machine - -- how to get out of this? Can’t just oppose
negatively.
Text is not
anti-Marxist – p.151 – against certain Marxist readings or tendencies
Assumed ideal
model & actual institutions
Overcode –
surplus value of code – p.150 – in excess/escapes the code
Coding =
territorial machine
Overcoding =
despotic machine – chief makes meal – prestige - way of introducing
transcendence in social figures – appropriated
Capitalism =
decoding
Earth = source
of the territorial machine – ground of territorial machine, which is the first
form of sociality (socius) – primitive, savage unity of desire & production
(140)
Social machine –
has men for its parts; fashions a memory; condition & organize – society -
socius of inscription – essential thing is to mark and to be marked – about
inscribing (142)
Megamachine –
social machine as a collective entity
No comments:
Post a Comment